Outputs Database
Use our database to find details of the various outputs coming out of the LuCiD Centre, from our research papers to radio interviews, powerpoint presentations to magazine articles. You can filter the database by author, subject category, year and resource type, selecting as many or few options as you would like.
Filter By
Showing 337 to 348 of 559
Ambridge, B., Bannard, C., Jackson, G. (2015). Is grammar spared in Autism Spectrum Disorder? Data from judgements of verb argument structure overgeneralization errors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45(10), 3288-3296
Chang, F. (2019). Early developing prerequisites for human interactive task learning. In K. A. Gluck and J. E. Laird (Eds), Interactive Task Learning: Agents, Robots, and Humans Acquiring New Tasks through Natural Interactions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press
McCauley, S.M., Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Chunking Ability Shapes Sentence Processing at Multiple Levels of Abstraction. (2) Poster presented at the 23rd Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP) Conference, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
McCauley, S.M., Isbilen, E.S., & Christiansen, M.H. (2017). Chunking ability shapes sentence processing at multiple levels of abstraction. (1) In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E.J. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2681-2686). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Ambridge, B. & Blything, R. (2015). A connectionist model of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1245-1276.
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Computational Investigations of Multiword Chunks in Language Learning. Top Cogn Sci, 9: 637-652.
Fitz, H. & Chang, F. (2017). Meaningful questions: The acquisition of auxiliary inversion in a connectionist model of sentence production. (1) Cognition, 166, 225-250
Blything, R.P., Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.V.M. (2017). Children's acquisition of the English past-Tense: Evidence for a single-route account from novel verb production data. Cognitive Science, 42 (Suppl 2), 621–639. doi:10.1111/cogs.12581
Ambridge, B. (2017). Syntactic categories in child language acquisition: innate, induced or illusory? In Cohen, H. & Lefebvre, C. (Eds). Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ambridge, B. (2017). Horses for courses: When acceptability judgments are more suitable than structural priming (and vice versa). Commentary on Branigan and Pickering. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 40. e284.
Granlund, S., Kolak, J., Vihman, V., Engelmann, F., Lieven, E., Pine, J., Theakston, A., & Ambridge, B. (2019). Language-general and language-specific phenomena in the acquisition of inflectional noun morphology: A cross-linguistic elicited-production study of Polish, Finnish and Estonian. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.04.004
Engelmann, F., Granlund, S., Kolak, J., Szreder, M., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., Theakston, A., and Lieven, E. (2019). How the input shapes the acquisition of verb morphology: Elicited production and computational modelling in two highly inflected languages. Cognitive Pscyhology, 110, 30-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.02.001